<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fuzz</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-18874</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comment-18874</guid>
		<description>well.........at least they're trying? :oops:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;at least they&#8217;re trying? <img src='http://www.fuzzmartin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomInWestBend</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-18872</link>
		<dc:creator>TomInWestBend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comment-18872</guid>
		<description>Ahem!

http://www.betanews.com/article/Day_One_for_Safari_for_Windows_Becomes_ZeroDay_Nightmare/1181661606

"It took security engineers perhaps less than two hours yesterday to introduce Apple's surprise entry in the field of Windows browsers to the big, cruel world of exploits and vulnerabilities, following its introduction yesterday morning at WWDC"

Tell me again why you should run Safari? I'll pass...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Day_One_for_Safari_for_Windows_Becomes_ZeroDay_Nightmare/1181661606" rel="nofollow">http://www.betanews.com/article/Day_One_for_Safari_for_Windows_Becomes_ZeroDay_Nightmare/1181661606</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It took security engineers perhaps less than two hours yesterday to introduce Apple&#8217;s surprise entry in the field of Windows browsers to the big, cruel world of exploits and vulnerabilities, following its introduction yesterday morning at WWDC&#8221;</p>
<p>Tell me again why you should run Safari? I&#8217;ll pass&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claude</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-18865</link>
		<dc:creator>claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comment-18865</guid>
		<description>I can understand where Tom is coming from.  Most computer geeks are in his court...and favor Mozilla anything because of its programmer friendly, open-sourceness.  I cannot say I don't agree with him...

But Safari on Windows is a smart move.  Why not?  Micro$oft stopped supporting IE on a Mac after IE5...so why not turn the tables and try and get on as many PCs as possible.  Just wait until Safari comes bundled with the iTunes d/l.  That is when it will start to see more of a market penetration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand where Tom is coming from.  Most computer geeks are in his court&#8230;and favor Mozilla anything because of its programmer friendly, open-sourceness.  I cannot say I don&#8217;t agree with him&#8230;</p>
<p>But Safari on Windows is a smart move.  Why not?  Micro$oft stopped supporting IE on a Mac after IE5&#8230;so why not turn the tables and try and get on as many PCs as possible.  Just wait until Safari comes bundled with the iTunes d/l.  That is when it will start to see more of a market penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomInWestBend</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-18862</link>
		<dc:creator>TomInWestBend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comment-18862</guid>
		<description>Okay, thats nice, but why would I want to even run Safari on windows? Safari on a Mac only does so much...

I'll stick to Firefox on EVERYTHING! (Windows, Linux, MAC, Solaris, Freebsd, and on and on and on...)

I'm a geek what can I say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, thats nice, but why would I want to even run Safari on windows? Safari on a Mac only does so much&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll stick to Firefox on EVERYTHING! (Windows, Linux, MAC, Solaris, Freebsd, and on and on and on&#8230;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a geek what can I say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzz</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-18857</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fuzzmartin.com/2007/06/11/safari-for-windows/#comment-18857</guid>
		<description>ADD to Glossary:
&lt;b&gt;PUBLIC BETA&lt;/b&gt;: a not-yet-ready-for-prime-time release of a new piece of software. It's software that's still in the testing stage. Google does this with ALL of their products ---&gt; to the point where even 3 years after their products are released they still say "beta" on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADD to Glossary:<br />
<b>PUBLIC BETA</b>: a not-yet-ready-for-prime-time release of a new piece of software. It&#8217;s software that&#8217;s still in the testing stage. Google does this with ALL of their products &#8212;> to the point where even 3 years after their products are released they still say &#8220;beta&#8221; on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
